Hettie Good's Deathbed Confession -- Murderess Mary Ridey and the Questionable Pardon -- Salome Whitman, Horse Thief and Temptress -- Emma Bickel and the Insanity Defense -- The Forger Julia Lippincott -- Kate Soffel: The Wayward Warden's Wife -- Bertha Beilstein, The Mad Murderess -- Helen Boyle, Heartless Kidnapper -- Irene Schroeder, The First Woman to Face Pennsylvania's Electric Chair.
Front Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1. Delaware County Before and at the Time of the Murder -- 2. The Sharpless Family -- 3. Samuel Johnson -- 4. The Murder -- 5. The Investigation -- 6. The Arrest -- 7. The Trial -- 8. The Verdict -- 9. Appeals and Petitions -- 10. Other Suspects -- 11. From Death to Life -- 12. Ten Years, Six Months, Nine Days -- 13. Her Beloved Husband -- Sources -- About the Author.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Motivated by researcher reflexivity, the author sought to learn from participants about the sensitive, ethical issues of the qualitative research process. The current study followed up with eight women who had previously participated in an interview-based study about sexual assault disclosure. Multiple sources of qualitative data were triangulated, including interviews, follow-up interviews, interviews from the original study, and participant checks. Phenomenological analysis yielded five themes: (a) Meaning of Participation, (b) Trust in the Researcher, (c) Connection with the Other Participants, (d) Changing Comfort, and (e) Recommendations to Increase Participants' Comfort. Based on these results, recommendations are provided for researchers conducting reflexive qualitative research practices.
Purpose: Stakeholder engagement and community-engaged research (CEnR) are recognized as approaches necessary to promote health equity. Few studies have examined variations in stakeholder perspectives on research ethics despite the potential for meaningful differences. Our study examines the association between stakeholders' characteristics and their perception of the importance of 15 stakeholder-developed CEnR ethical statements.Design: Quantitative analysis of close-ended Delphi survey.Participants: We recruited a national, non-random, purposive sample of people who were eligible if they endorsed conducting CEnR in public health or biomedical fields. Participants were recruited from publicly available information, professional email distributions, and snowball sampling.Main Outcome Measures: We designed our close-ended Delphi survey from the results of 15 CEnR ethical statements, which were developed from a consensus development workshop with academic and community stakeholders.Results: 259 participants completed the Delphi survey. The results demonstrated that stakeholders' characteristics (affiliation, ethnicity, number of CEnR relationships, and duration of CEnR partnerships) were not associated with their perception of the importance of 15 ethical statements.Conclusions: The strong agreement among stakeholders on these broad, aspirational ethical statements can help guide partnerships toward ethical decisions and actions. Continued research about variability among stakeholders' ethics perspectives is needed to bolster the capacity of CEnR to contribute to health equity.Ethn Dis. 2019;29(2):309- 316. doi:10.18865/ed.29.2.309
